Justice Department Argues For Restoration Of Trump Travel Ban

The Justice Department argued Tuesday that a federal appeals court should overturn a district court judge’s order halting President Trump’s executive action suspending travel to the U.S. from seven majority-Muslim nations.

The hearing before the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit Court of Appeals judges was the greatest legal challenge yet to the travel ban, which has upended travel to the U.S. for more than a week and tested the new administration’s use of executive power.

Several states have fought the ban on travellers from seven predominantly Muslim nations — Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Yemen — and insisted that it is unconstitutional.

Justice Department attorney August Flentje asked the court to restore Trump’s order, contending that the president alone has the power to decide who can enter or stay in the United States, as well as suspend classes of aliens when their entry to the country is otherwise detrimental to national security.

“That’s what the president did here,” Flentje argued.

The government described the executive order as a “90-day pause” needed to ensure adequate standards were in place for visa screening, which Flentje called “plainly constitutional.”



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s